START ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS Our Latest
Legal Insights

H-1B workers in Tysons face termination consequences ordinary employees do not: the 60-day grace period to find new sponsorship, the LCA-related obligations, the I-140 portability rules, and the immigration status implications that can move from green card track to departure within weeks. Employers know this and sometimes use it. I represent H-1B workers in Tysons termination cases. Call me before the grace period closes.

Tysons workers fired because of sexual orientation or gender identity have stronger protections than many employers acknowledge. Bostock v. Clayton County established that Title VII reaches LGBTQ+ discrimination, and the Virginia Values Act expanded the Virginia Human Rights Act to cover sexual orientation and gender identity explicitly. The frameworks reach the conduct, but the cases require careful documentation. I represent LGBTQ+ workers in Tysons termination cases. Call me before signing.

"Client-facing" is not the magic word that defeats remote work accommodation requests. The ADA interactive process requires genuine analysis of whether the role's essential functions can be performed with the accommodation, not a reflexive policy denial. Tysons employers who refused remote and hybrid accommodations after the pandemic, then fired workers for performance issues correlated with the unaccommodated condition, often have weak defenses. I represent these workers. Call me.