Every construction dispute starts in the contract, and most could have been prevented there. We draft and review prime contracts for owners and contractors across Northern Virginia, with the payment, scope, and default terms Virginia law now requires.
Sources: Code of Virginia § 11-4.6 (required payment provisions in construction contracts and the ban on pay-if-paid conditions, applicable to contracts entered into after January 1, 2023, as amended effective July 1, 2023); § 8.01-246 (five year limit on written contract claims); § 8.01-250 (five year statute of repose measured from completion).
The most common cause of construction disputes is parties failing to understand or follow their own contract. Virginia has also rewritten what a construction contract must say about payment, which means a form that worked a few years ago may now contain unenforceable terms. The document deserves real attention before anyone signs it.
A prime construction contract allocates every risk on the job: who pays for a delay, what counts as complete, when money is due, what happens on default, and where a fight gets decided. Those answers get set at signing, long before anyone knows which side of them they will be on. A standard AIA form is a reasonable skeleton, but the blanks, the riders, and Virginia’s statutory overlays are where the real terms live, and an off the shelf form drafted for another state can carry payment clauses Virginia now refuses to enforce.
We draft and review prime contracts for owners and general contractors, on either side of the table. Getting the document right up front is the cheapest insurance against a contract dispute later, and it works hand in hand with the change order and documentation procedures that keep the record clean while the job runs.
Schedule a ConsultationThe terms that decide construction outcomes, drafted with your side of the job in mind.
Building the owner and contractor agreement from the ground up, or from an AIA base, with terms that fit the project and Virginia law.
Reading the other side’s draft before you sign, flagging the risk shifts, and marking up the terms that need to change.
Structuring pay applications, deadlines, withholding procedures, and retainage so the terms comply with Virginia’s payment statute.
Defining the work, the milestones, and who bears the cost of a slip, including notice requirements and liquidated damages terms.
Writing termination for cause and for convenience, cure periods, and remedies, so ending a bad job does not create a worse claim.
Choosing arbitration or court deliberately, setting notice and claim procedures, and defining the warranty that survives completion.
For construction contracts entered into after the start of 2023, Virginia writes payment terms into the deal whether the parties draft them or not. A private owner must pay the general contractor within sixty days of receiving an invoice for satisfactorily completed work, and an owner who intends to withhold must say so in writing within forty five days, identifying the specific noncompliance and the dollar amount. The general contractor must pay a subcontractor within the earlier of sixty days of the subcontractor’s invoice or seven days after receiving the owner’s payment, with a written withholding notice due within fifty days. Most importantly, pay-if-paid conditions are gone: the owner’s payment cannot be a condition of paying the subcontractor, outside owner insolvency or bankruptcy, and any contrary provision is unenforceable. Retainage terms are untouched, and the payment rules do not reach pure material suppliers. Around those mandatory terms, the parties still control everything else: scope, schedule, delay risk, liquidated damages, termination, warranties, and whether disputes go to arbitration or court. And the clock matters even at the drafting stage, because written contract claims generally carry a five year limit and Virginia’s statute of repose can cut off defect claims five years from completion, which is the horizon your warranty and claims terms live under.
“I litigate construction disputes, so I know exactly which clauses end up in front of a judge, and that is precisely how I draft. The most common cause of these fights is not bad faith. It is parties who never understood their own contract, or a form that quietly stopped complying when Virginia rewrote the payment rules. An afternoon spent getting the payment terms, the change order procedure, and the termination clause right costs a fraction of what one dispute does. I would rather draft the contract that keeps you out of my litigation practice.”
The terms are far easier to shape at the table than to argue about on the job. Send us the draft, or let us build one that fits your project. Serving Leesburg, Fairfax, and all of Northern Virginia.