The indemnity paragraph everyone skips and the insurance exhibit nobody reads decide who pays when a project goes wrong. Virginia voids some of those clauses outright. We draft and review the risk transfer terms for Northern Virginia projects.
Sources: Code of Virginia § 11-4.1 (certain indemnification provisions in construction contracts void as against public policy, with an express carve out for insurance contracts, applied by the Supreme Court of Virginia to clauses requiring indemnity regardless of the indemnitor’s fault); § 11-4.4 (the parallel rule for design professionals); § 8.01-250 (five year statute of repose); Virginia decisions reading the subcontractor exception to the commercial general liability “your work” exclusion narrowly.
Risk clauses fail quietly. The indemnity paragraph reads fierce but turns out void, the certificate of insurance proves nothing, and the liability policy everyone assumed would cover bad workmanship excludes it. None of that surfaces until a loss happens, which is precisely why these terms deserve a lawyer’s eyes before signing rather than after the crane comes down.
Construction contracts move risk three ways: indemnity clauses shift liability between the parties, insurance requirements put policies behind the promises, and warranty terms define what must be fixed after completion. Each channel has its own rules in Virginia, and they only work when they line up. An indemnity clause drafted past what the statute allows protects no one. An insurance exhibit that demands a certificate instead of an endorsement collects paper instead of coverage. A warranty that ignores the repose period promises more than the law will enforce.
We draft and review these terms across the whole contract set, so the prime contract, the subcontracts, and the design agreements allocate risk the same way instead of pointing at each other. And when a loss outruns the coverage, our litigation side pursues bond and surety claims and the disputes that follow, which is how we know where these clauses actually get tested.
Schedule a ConsultationThe clauses that decide who pays for a loss, drafted so they hold when tested.
Writing indemnity that survives the statute, and flagging the broad form language Virginia refuses to enforce before you rely on it.
Setting the coverage types, limits, and duration a project actually needs, written as obligations the other side has to prove, not just certify.
The endorsements and waivers that move risk onto policies, drafted so the coverage exists in the policy and not just in the contract.
Assigning who insures the project itself and who insures the operations, so the two policies meet instead of leaving a gap between them.
Drafting express warranty and correction terms against the five year repose horizon, because defective work itself is often the uninsured risk.
Reading the prime contract, subcontracts, and design agreements together, so indemnity, insurance, and warranties point one direction.
Virginia polices the indemnity channel directly. A provision in a construction contract that makes the contractor indemnify another party for bodily injury or property damage caused solely by that other party’s own negligence is against public policy, void, and unenforceable, on private and public projects alike, and the Supreme Court of Virginia has applied the rule to language obligating indemnity regardless of whose fault caused the loss. A parallel statute voids comparable provisions involving design professionals. The statute expressly spares insurance contracts, and that carve out explains how sophisticated projects actually move risk: through additional insured endorsements, waivers of subrogation, and coverage requirements that put an insurer’s balance sheet behind the obligation instead of a bare promise the statute may erase. The insurance itself needs honest reading too. A commercial general liability policy is not a warranty of the work, and Virginia courts have read the subcontractor exception to the “your work” exclusion narrowly, so the cost of repairing or replacing defective work is often outside coverage entirely, which is exactly the weight the contract’s warranty and correction terms have to carry. Builder’s risk insurance covers the project property while it is being built, general liability covers the operations, and the contract should say plainly who buys each and how the deductibles fall. All of it sits under the five year statute of repose measured from completion, the outer horizon against which every warranty promise and every coverage decision should be read.
“After a loss, the first thing everyone does is open the contract to the indemnity clause, and that is usually the moment they learn what it actually says. I have seen parties discover their fiercest looking clause was void under the statute, and I have seen certificates of insurance stacked in a file for coverage that never existed on the policy. Risk transfer only works when the contract, the endorsements, and the warranties were built to fit together before the job started. That review takes hours. Finding out the hard way takes years.”
An afternoon of review tells you whether the indemnity holds, the coverage exists, and the warranties match the law. Send us the contract set. Serving Leesburg, Fairfax, and all of Northern Virginia.