Illinois Wrongful Death: A Northern Virginia Family’s Guide

By Anthony I. Shin, Esq., Shin Law Office

1. Why Northern Virginia Families End Up With Illinois Wrongful Death Cases

Northern Virginia and Illinois share more business and federal traffic than most state pairings. Chicago O’Hare is one of the busiest airports in the world, with dozens of daily flights linking it to Reagan, Dulles, and BWI, and Midway adding more capacity from the south side. Naval Station Great Lakes, the Navy’s only basic training center, sits about 35 miles north of Chicago with roughly 26,000 personnel. Northern Virginia Navy families and contractors rotate through Great Lakes on a regular basis.

The business side runs even deeper. Chicago is the third-largest United States metropolitan area and one of the country’s major commercial, financial, and transportation centers. Boeing’s commercial aircraft headquarters relocated from Chicago to Northern Virginia in 2022, but substantial Chicago operations remain. United Airlines is headquartered there, along with Allstate, Caterpillar, McDonald’s, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Abbott Laboratories, Kraft Heinz, Discover Financial, CDW, Exelon, AbbVie, and many other major corporations. The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the Chicago Board Options Exchange support continuous Northern Virginia federal contractor travel.

In my practice, Illinois wrongful death cases follow several recurring patterns. A business traveler dies during a meeting at a Chicago-headquartered company. A federal contractor on a quick trip to Naval Station Great Lakes crashes on I-94, I-90, or the I-294 toll route. A family attending a Cubs, White Sox, Bears, Bulls, or Blackhawks game loses someone in or near the stadium. A student at the University of Chicago, Northwestern, Loyola University Chicago, DePaul, or the University of Illinois at Chicago dies in an off-campus incident. A grandparent visiting family in Chicago or the surrounding suburbs (Naperville, Schaumburg, Oak Brook, Hinsdale, Wilmette, Evanston) dies of medical negligence at Northwestern Memorial, Rush University Medical Center, the University of Chicago Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, or one of the suburban hospital systems.

A handful of less common patterns rounds out the case mix. A family on Lake Michigan experiences a fatal marine incident under the federal maritime overlay. A family caught in a Chicago winter storm encounters cold-weather vehicle crashes, hypothermia, or building damage from heavy snow. A retired federal worker who relocated to Illinois dies of wrongful conduct. A business traveler dies in a crash on Lake Shore Drive, the Dan Ryan Expressway, or the Edens Expressway. Each of these cases puts the family on the wrong side of the country, dealing with an unfamiliar legal system from 600 miles away.

The Illinois recovery framework, between the 2007 grief amendment and the post-Lebron absence of the medmal cap, sits among the more plaintiff-friendly in the country. The procedural rules, however, contain traps that catch out-of-state attorneys with regularity.

2. Where Illinois Sits on the Wrongful Death Map

Illinois wrongful death law has moved through four major reform periods that together shape the modern framework. The 1853 Illinois Wrongful Death Act, one of the earliest in the country following Lord Campbell’s Act, set the foundation. The 1995 comprehensive tort reform package was largely struck down in Best v. Taylor Machine Works, 179 Ill.2d 367 (1997). The 2005 medical malpractice reform package was struck down in Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, 237 Ill.2d 217 (2010). And the 2007 amendment to 740 ILCS 180/2 added grief, sorrow, and mental suffering damages. Two of the four reform efforts (the 1995 package and the 2005 medmal cap) were rejected by the Illinois Supreme Court on constitutional grounds, which is itself notable about how Illinois tort law develops.

The core statutes. 740 ILCS 180/1 et seq. is the Illinois Wrongful Death Act. Section 180/1 creates the cause of action. Section 180/2 lists recoverable damages and identifies beneficiaries. Section 180/2(d) sets the 2-year statute of limitations. 755 ILCS 5/27-6, within the Illinois Probate Act, is the parallel Survival Act.

Recoverable damages. Under 740 ILCS 180/2, recoverable damages start with pecuniary loss to the surviving spouse and next of kin: lost financial support, lost services, lost benefits, lost inheritance, and similar economic categories. After the 2007 amendment in P.A. 95-3, the damages list expanded to add grief, sorrow, and mental suffering for surviving spouses and next of kin. Reasonable funeral and burial expenses are also recoverable.

Beneficiaries. The wrongful death action is brought for the exclusive benefit of the surviving spouse and next of kin. Next of kin is determined by Illinois intestate succession rules at 755 ILCS 5/2-1. The personal representative of the decedent’s estate is the procedural party. Illinois probate proceedings in the appropriate Probate Division of the Circuit Court qualify the personal representative.

The Survival Act. 755 ILCS 5/27-6 preserves the causes of action that the decedent had at the time of death. The estate, through the personal representative, recovers pre-death conscious pain and suffering, pre-death medical expenses, pre-death lost wages, and other pre-death damages. The survival action runs alongside the wrongful death action.

The Lebron decision. The Illinois Supreme Court in Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital held that the 2005 medical malpractice non-economic damages cap (Public Act 94-677) violated the separation of powers clause of the Illinois Constitution by impermissibly limiting the judicial power to remit damages awards. The decision invalidated the entire 2005 reform package because the cap was not severable. Illinois has not enacted a replacement framework that has survived constitutional analysis.

Modified comparative fault. 735 ILCS 5/2-1116 sets modified comparative fault with a 51-percent bar. Recovery is barred only if the plaintiff’s fault is greater than 50 percent. Recovery is proportionally reduced for plaintiff fault of 50 percent or less. This is the more plaintiff-friendly version of the modified rule, parallel to Texas, New Jersey, Ohio, and post-HB-837 Florida.

Tiered joint and several liability. 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 sets a distinctive tiered framework. Defendants with 25 percent or more fault remain jointly and severally liable for both economic and non-economic damages. Defendants with less than 25 percent fault are severally liable only for non-economic damages, but they remain jointly and severally liable for medical and earnings-related economic damages. The 25-percent threshold is unique to Illinois and shapes multi-defendant case strategy.

Statute of limitations. 740 ILCS 180/2(d) sets a 2-year SOL for wrongful death, running from the date of death. 735 ILCS 5/13-202 sets a 2-year general personal injury SOL that governs the survival action. 735 ILCS 5/13-212 sets a 2-year medical malpractice discovery rule with a 4-year statute of repose.

Punitive damages. 735 ILCS 5/2-1115 provides that punitive damages are not recoverable in actions for healing art or legal malpractice. In other tort cases, punitive damages are available on a showing of willful and wanton conduct. Illinois has no statutory cap on punitive damages.

The Tort Immunity Act. 745 ILCS 10 governs claims against Illinois local governments. The Act includes various immunities and a 1-year SOL under 745 ILCS 10/8-101 that overrides the general 2-year tort SOL for any local government defendant.

The Illinois Court of Claims. 705 ILCS 505 establishes the Court of Claims for claims against the State of Illinois. Section 505/8 caps awards at $100,000 for tort claims. Section 505/22 requires notice within 1 year of accrual.

3. Virginia’s Lex Loci Delicti Rule Applied to Illinois

When a Northern Virginia family considers an Illinois wrongful death case, the threshold question is whose law governs. Virginia answers with a rule called lex loci delicti, Latin for “law of the place of the wrong.” If the wrong happened in Illinois, Illinois substantive law applies.

The McMillan rule. Under McMillan v. McMillan, 219 Va. 1127 (1979), Virginia courts apply the substantive law of the state where the wrong occurred. For an Illinois wrongful death case, that means the Wrongful Death Act with the 2007 grief amendment, the post-Lebron absence of the medmal cap, the Survival Act, the 51-percent modified comparative fault rule, the tiered joint and several framework, the punitive damages framework with the medmal and legal malpractice carve-out, the Tort Immunity Act, and the Court of Claims framework all travel with the case.

The 2007 grief amendment as substantive law. The grief and mental suffering damages added by P.A. 95-3 are substantive Illinois law and follow the case under lex loci. A Virginia court applying Illinois substantive law to an Illinois wrongful death case would allow those damages.

Absence of the medmal cap as substantive law. The post-Lebron absence of the medmal non-economic damages cap is the operative Illinois rule and applies under lex loci.

Filing in Illinois versus Virginia. Most Illinois wrongful death cases I work for Northern Virginia families end up filed in Illinois. The evidence, witnesses, and defendants are there. The Circuit Court of Cook County handles most Chicago-area cases through its Law Division. The Circuit Court of Lake County covers Naval Station Great Lakes and many northern Chicago suburbs. The Circuit Court of DuPage County (Naperville and the western Chicago suburbs) and the Circuit Court of Will County (Joliet area) handle other suburban cases. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, with its Eastern Division in Chicago and Western Division in Rockford, handles federal diversity and FTCA cases.

Federal Tort Claims Act. Federal employee cases involving Naval Station Great Lakes, the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center in Chicago, federal contractors at federal facilities, or other federal employees proceed under the FTCA. The administrative claim is due within 2 years. Illinois substantive law governs damages, including the post-Lebron uncapped non-economic recovery.

4. The 2007 Amendment and Grief/Mental Suffering Damages

The 2007 amendment to the Illinois Wrongful Death Act was one of the most plaintiff-favorable damages expansions in the Midwest. To understand what it changed, start with the framework it replaced.

The pre-2007 framework. Before 2007, the Illinois Wrongful Death Act allowed recovery only of pecuniary loss to the surviving spouse and next of kin. Pecuniary loss was interpreted broadly in Illinois case law to include lost financial support, lost services, lost benefits, and lost inheritance, plus loss of consortium and society under Bullard v. Barnes, 102 Ill.2d 505 (1984). But the survivors’ own grief, sorrow, and mental suffering were not separately recoverable. Illinois sat in a small group of states with that exclusion.

Public Act 95-3. Public Act 95-3, effective May 31, 2007, amended 740 ILCS 180/2 to add grief, sorrow, and mental suffering as recoverable damages. The legislature’s view was that the prior exclusion had produced inequitable results where the survivors’ emotional impact was profound but went uncompensated.

The post-2007 recovery framework. Surviving spouses and next of kin can now recover three new categories in addition to the traditional pecuniary loss and loss of society and consortium. Grief covers the survivors’ own emotional response to the loss. Sorrow covers the survivors’ continuing emotional distress. Mental suffering covers the survivors’ psychological impact of the loss. These categories are pleaded and proven through survivor testimony and, in appropriate cases, mental health expert testimony.

Application across the case mix. The 2007 amendment applies to all Illinois wrongful death cases regardless of cause. Vehicle crash, premises liability, product liability, and medical malpractice cases all benefit from the expanded recovery. Combined with the post-Lebron absence of any medmal cap, the 2007 amendment puts Illinois medmal wrongful death recovery among the broadest in the country.

Strategic implications. For Illinois wrongful death cases, the grief and mental suffering damages need development from the earliest stages. Survivor testimony about the relationship, the impact of the loss on each survivor, ongoing emotional distress, and family dynamics changes all build the foundation. Mental health expert testimony supports the presentation in appropriate cases. Documentation of grief counseling or therapy reinforces credibility. Fact testimony from extended family members provides corroboration.

5. Lebron and the Invalidation of the Medmal Cap

The Lebron decision is one of the most consequential medical malpractice law decisions in any state in the past two decades. The arc from a 2005 reform package to a 2010 Illinois Supreme Court invalidation shows how a constitutional doctrine can reshape an entire body of law in a relatively short period.

The 2005 reform package. Public Act 94-677, signed into law in 2005, was a comprehensive medical malpractice reform package. The centerpiece was a non-economic damages cap of $500,000 for physician defendants and $1 million for hospital defendants. The legislature framed the cap as a response to a medical malpractice insurance crisis and physicians leaving the state.

Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital. Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, 237 Ill.2d 217, 930 N.E.2d 895 (2010), arose from a catastrophic medical malpractice case involving brain damage to a child. The Illinois Supreme Court held that the non-economic damages cap in P.A. 94-677 violated the Illinois Constitution’s separation of powers clause (Article II, Section 1) by impermissibly limiting the judicial power to assess damages awards through the doctrine of remittitur. The cap operated as a legislative remittitur without the constitutional safeguards (notice, hearing, evidentiary basis) of judicial remittitur.

Non-severability. The Lebron court also held that the cap was not severable from the rest of P.A. 94-677. The non-severability ruling invalidated the entire 2005 reform package, including various procedural reforms and Sorry Works Act provisions that had been bundled with the cap. The legislature had to start from scratch.

The constitutional reasoning. The Lebron majority distinguished other states (Texas, Maryland, Colorado, Ohio) where caps had been upheld under different constitutional frameworks. The Illinois separation of powers clause, the court reasoned, is more protective of the judicial role than the equivalent clauses elsewhere.

The dissent and ongoing debate. The Lebron dissent argued for upholding the cap under rational basis review. Despite multiple legislative attempts since 2010, Illinois has not enacted a replacement medmal cap framework that has survived constitutional analysis. The combination of the constitutional reasoning and the political environment has produced an unusually stable framework: more than fifteen years without a cap.

Practical impact. Illinois medical malpractice cases face no statutory cap on non-economic damages. Combined with the 2007 grief and mental suffering amendment, the post-Lebron framework produces the broadest non-economic damages recovery in any Midwest state.

FTCA implications. Federal Tort Claims Act cases involving Illinois-based federal healthcare providers (the Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, federal contractors at federal medical facilities) apply Illinois substantive law on damages. The post-Lebron absence of the cap travels into FTCA cases.

6. The Survival Act at 755 ILCS 5/27-6

The Illinois Survival Act preserves the decedent’s pre-death claims and runs in parallel with the wrongful death action. The two claims live alongside each other, with the wrongful death action recovering for what the family lost and the survival action recovering for what the decedent suffered.

The statutory basis. 755 ILCS 5/27-6, within the Illinois Probate Act, provides that all causes of action existing in favor of or against a decedent survive death and may be brought or continued by the personal representative of the estate. The structure preserves the decedent’s own claims as assets of the estate.

Recoverable damages. Pre-death conscious pain and suffering. Pre-impact terror, where the evidence supports awareness of what was about to happen. Pre-death mental anguish. Pre-death medical expenses. Pre-death lost wages. The survival action recovers for the decedent’s own losses, not the family’s losses.

Post-Lebron impact on survival damages. Survival action non-economic damages, particularly pre-death pain and suffering, were historically subject to the 2005 cap that Lebron struck down. Survival action non-economic damages are now uncapped, subject only to common law and federal due process excessiveness review.

Statute of limitations. The survival action follows the general personal injury SOL under 735 ILCS 5/13-202 (2 years from the date of injury). Medical malpractice survival actions face the 2-year discovery rule and the 4-year statute of repose under 735 ILCS 5/13-212.

Distribution. Survival action recovery belongs to the estate and is distributed under the decedent’s will or by intestate succession. Wrongful death recovery is separately apportioned among the surviving spouse and next of kin. The two recoveries stay structurally distinct.

Personal representative qualification. Both the wrongful death and survival actions are brought by the personal representative of the estate. Illinois probate proceedings in the Probate Division of the appropriate Circuit Court qualify the personal representative. For Northern Virginia families, Virginia probate qualifies the personal representative first, with ancillary Illinois administration handling the survival action.

7. Modified Comparative Fault and the Tiered J&S Framework

Illinois pairs the more plaintiff-friendly 51-percent fault bar with a distinctive 25-percent threshold for joint and several liability. The combination produces strategic considerations unique to Illinois practice.

The 51-percent rule. 735 ILCS 5/2-1116 bars recovery only if the plaintiff’s fault is greater than 50 percent. Recovery is proportionally reduced for plaintiff fault of 50 percent or less. A plaintiff who is exactly 50 percent at fault still recovers half of the damages. The 51-percent rule matches Texas, New Jersey, Ohio, and post-HB-837 Florida.

Comparison with Virginia. Virginia’s contributory negligence rule bars recovery if the decedent was at all at fault. Illinois’s 51-percent rule allows recovery up to 50 percent of decedent fault. The difference can be the entire case in any partial-fault scenario.

The tiered joint and several framework. 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 sets a tiered framework unique to Illinois. Defendants with 25 percent or more fault remain jointly and severally liable for both economic and non-economic damages. Defendants with less than 25 percent fault are severally liable only for non-economic damages, but they remain jointly and severally liable for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and lost earning capacity, the economic categories that often drive recovery in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases.

How the threshold plays out. The 25-percent threshold creates strategic considerations in any multi-defendant case. Plaintiffs want their named defendants to face 25-percent-or-more findings to preserve joint liability across all damage categories. The framework also allows partial allocation to non-parties (settling defendants, immune defendants, unknown actors), which reduces the named defendants’ apparent fault percentage and can drop them below the 25-percent threshold. Careful joinder strategy and settlement positioning matter throughout the case.

The medical-defendant carve-out. Even for defendants with less than 25 percent fault, joint and several liability is preserved for medical expenses and lost earnings. This carve-out gives meaningful protection in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases, where economic damages frequently dwarf the non-economic categories. Plaintiffs can collect the full economic recovery from any solvent defendant above the threshold while limiting non-economic exposure to each defendant’s proportional share.

8. Statute of Limitations and the Tort Immunity Act

Illinois has several procedural traps that catch out-of-state attorneys regularly. The 2-year wrongful death SOL is conventional. The 4-year medmal statute of repose is aggressive. The Tort Immunity Act 1-year SOL for local government defendants is the most dangerous of all because it is shorter than almost any other deadline in this series.

The 2-year wrongful death SOL. 740 ILCS 180/2(d) sets a 2-year limitations period for wrongful death, running from the date of death. The discovery rule generally does not apply because the date of death is fixed and ascertainable.

The 2-year personal injury SOL. 735 ILCS 5/13-202 sets a 2-year limitations period for general personal injury, which governs the survival action and runs from the date of the underlying injury.

The medmal discovery rule and 4-year repose. 735 ILCS 5/13-212(a) imposes a 2-year discovery rule for medical malpractice: the action must be filed within 2 years of when the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known of the injury and that it was wrongfully caused. The same section also imposes a 4-year statute of repose: the action cannot be filed more than 4 years after the act of malpractice. Narrow exceptions for fraud and intentional concealment appear in Section 13-212(b) and (c). For minors, the medmal SOL is extended under Section 13-212(b), typically until age 8.

The Tort Immunity Act 1-year SOL. 745 ILCS 10/8-101 establishes a 1-year statute of limitations for civil actions against local governments. The 1-year deadline is one of the shortest in any state in this series. For wrongful death cases against local government defendants, the 1-year SOL controls and overrides the 2-year wrongful death SOL. Cities, counties, school districts, park districts, library districts, and other units of local government are all covered. This rule is responsible for more missed Illinois deadlines than any other.

Tort Immunity Act immunities. Beyond the 1-year deadline, the Act provides various immunities: discretionary acts under Section 2-201, certain emergency response under Sections 4-102 and 4-105, certain law enforcement activities under Section 2-202, and others. The immunities can be case-dispositive even where the deadline is met.

The Illinois Court of Claims. 705 ILCS 505 establishes the Illinois Court of Claims for claims against the State of Illinois (state agencies, the University of Illinois system, the Illinois Department of Transportation, the Illinois State Police, the Illinois Department of Corrections, state hospitals). Section 505/8 caps awards at $100,000 for tort claims. That cap is one of the lowest sovereign immunity caps in this series. Section 505/22 requires notice within 1 year of accrual.

Federal Tort Claims Act. Federal employee cases at Naval Station Great Lakes, the Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, or other federal facilities follow the FTCA. The administrative claim is due within 2 years. Illinois substantive law governs damages.

9. Punitive Damages and the Medmal Carve-Out

Illinois’s punitive damages framework is generally favorable to plaintiffs, with no statutory cap and a clear common-law standard. The one major exception, the statutory exclusion for healing art and legal malpractice cases, is unusual enough to require careful handling.

The substantive standard. Illinois common law requires clear and convincing evidence of willful and wanton conduct for punitive damages. Ordinary negligence does not support punitive damages. Even gross negligence often falls short.

The 735 ILCS 5/2-1115 exclusion. 735 ILCS 5/2-1115 provides that punitive damages are not recoverable in any action in which the plaintiff seeks damages for an injury based on healing art malpractice or legal malpractice. “Healing art” includes the practice of medicine across a wide range of providers: physicians, hospitals, nurses, physical therapists, chiropractors, dentists, podiatrists, optometrists, psychologists, and others. The exclusion applies to medical malpractice wrongful death cases. Out-of-state counsel sometimes miss this rule and plead punitive damages in medical malpractice cases reflexively.

Punitive damages outside the exclusion. Punitive damages remain available in non-medmal Illinois tort cases on the willful and wanton conduct standard. Vehicle crash cases involving DUI, reckless driving, or other egregious conduct, premises liability cases involving deliberate disregard of safety, product liability cases involving deliberate cost-cutting on safety features, and similar cases can support punitive damages.

No statutory cap. Illinois has no statutory cap on punitive damages. The only limits come from federal due process under State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), and BMW v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559 (1996).

Bifurcation. Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219 and the common law allow bifurcation of the punitive damages phase from the compensatory and liability phase in appropriate cases.

Punitive damages against public entities. The Tort Immunity Act and the Court of Claims Act prohibit punitive damages against governmental entities. Punitive damages remain available against individual public employees in their personal capacity for conduct outside the scope of immunity.

10. How I Work Illinois Wrongful Death Cases for Northern Virginia Families

When a Northern Virginia family calls me about a death in Illinois, the engagement focuses on a defined set of early tasks. Illinois’s mix of broad recovery rules and demanding procedural deadlines makes the first weeks of the case especially important.

The deadline check. The first call identifies every possible deadline. The 2-year wrongful death SOL under 740 ILCS 180/2(d). The 2-year personal injury SOL under 735 ILCS 5/13-202 for the survival action. The 2-year medmal discovery rule and 4-year statute of repose under 735 ILCS 5/13-212. The Tort Immunity Act 1-year SOL under 745 ILCS 10/8-101 for any potential local government defendant. The Court of Claims 1-year notice under 705 ILCS 505/22 for State of Illinois defendants. The FTCA 2-year administrative claim deadline for federal employee cases.

Post-Lebron medmal posture. For medical malpractice cases, the absence of any non-economic damages cap means full recovery is available. The damages presentation can be built without artificial constraint, with detailed survivor testimony, mental health expert support where appropriate, and a thorough economic loss workup.

The 2007 grief amendment positioning. For any Illinois wrongful death case, the grief, sorrow, and mental suffering damages for each survivor need development from the earliest stages.

Tort Immunity Act defendant identification. Within the first week, I identify every possible local government defendant: Chicago, Cook County, suburban municipalities, school districts, park districts, library districts, public hospitals operated by governmental units. Any local government defendant triggers the 1-year SOL under 745 ILCS 10/8-101.

Court of Claims defendant identification. The next pass identifies any potential State of Illinois defendant: state agencies, the University of Illinois system, the Illinois Department of Transportation, the Illinois State Police, state hospitals like the University of Illinois Hospital. State defendants require a Court of Claims filing with the 1-year notice and the $100,000 cap.

Personal representative qualification. Open Virginia probate for the Northern Virginia decedent. Obtain Illinois ancillary administration in the appropriate Probate Division of the Circuit Court (Cook County for Chicago cases, Lake County for the Great Lakes area, DuPage County for the western suburbs) so a personal representative is qualified to bring the wrongful death and survival actions.

Evidence preservation. Illinois evidence preservation needs immediate action. Police reports from the Illinois State Police, Chicago Police, county sheriffs, or suburban police departments. Medical records with HIPAA-compliant authorizations. Vehicle reconstruction, premises maintenance records, surveillance footage, military incident reports for Naval Station Great Lakes cases, and hospital records for medmal cases all need to be preserved at the earliest possible stage.

Illinois counsel coordination. I work with Illinois counsel admitted to practice for filing and court appearances. Cook County Circuit Court Law Division is one of the most active civil dockets in the country and requires local expertise. So does the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Illinois counsel bring familiarity with the 25-percent joint and several threshold, Tort Immunity Act compliance, and the post-Lebron medmal framework.

Damages workup. An Illinois-licensed economist projects lost earnings and lost support. Household services experts value work the decedent did at home. Mental health experts support the grief and mental suffering presentation. Medical experts develop pre-death pain and suffering and, in medmal cases, the standard of care testimony.

The settlement framework. Most Illinois wrongful death cases resolve through settlement. The post-Lebron medmal framework and the 2007 grief amendment together produce settlement values higher than in cap-imposing jurisdictions. The 25-percent joint and several threshold creates strong leverage in multi-defendant cases. The Tort Immunity Act and Court of Claims caps define ceilings for governmental defendants.

The litigation timeline. Most Illinois wrongful death cases take 18 to 30 months from filing to resolution. Cook County Circuit Court Law Division has substantial backlogs but sophisticated case management. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division in Chicago) operates on tighter schedules and is one of the more sophisticated federal forums in the country.

Summary

Illinois wrongful death law has been substantially expanded by two developments since the mid-2000s. Public Act 95-3 (effective May 31, 2007) amended 740 ILCS 180/2 to add grief, sorrow, and mental suffering as recoverable damages alongside the traditional pecuniary loss categories. Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, 237 Ill.2d 217 (2010), struck down the 2005 medical malpractice non-economic damages cap as a violation of the Illinois Constitution’s separation of powers clause and held the cap not severable from the rest of P.A. 94-677. Illinois has not enacted a replacement medmal cap framework that has survived constitutional analysis.

The Illinois Wrongful Death Act at 740 ILCS 180/1 et seq. allows recovery by the surviving spouse and next of kin (defined by Illinois intestate succession at 755 ILCS 5/2-1). The personal representative of the decedent’s estate brings the action. The Illinois Survival Act at 755 ILCS 5/27-6 separately preserves the decedent’s pre-death claims.

The wrongful death SOL is 2 years from death under 740 ILCS 180/2(d). The general personal injury SOL is 2 years under 735 ILCS 5/13-202. Medical malpractice has a 2-year discovery rule and 4-year statute of repose under 735 ILCS 5/13-212. The Tort Immunity Act at 745 ILCS 10/8-101 imposes a 1-year SOL for claims against local government defendants. The Illinois Court of Claims under 705 ILCS 505 has exclusive jurisdiction over claims against the State of Illinois with a $100,000 cap and a 1-year notice requirement.

Illinois applies modified comparative fault with a 51-percent bar under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116. Joint and several liability under 735 ILCS 5/2-1117 follows a tiered framework: defendants with 25 percent or more fault remain jointly and severally liable for all damages, while defendants with less than 25 percent fault are severally liable only for non-economic damages but remain jointly liable for medical and earnings-related economic damages.

Punitive damages under 735 ILCS 5/2-1115 are not recoverable in healing art malpractice or legal malpractice cases. In other tort cases, punitive damages are available on clear and convincing evidence of willful and wanton conduct, with no statutory cap.

Virginia courts apply Illinois substantive wrongful death law under McMillan v. McMillan, 219 Va. 1127 (1979). Most Northern Virginia families with Illinois wrongful death cases file in the Illinois Circuit Court or the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. I work with Illinois local counsel on filings and court appearances while leading strategy and damages workups.

For the framework that runs through every state guide in this series, see my cornerstone guide for multi-state wrongful death.

Frequently Asked Questions

Anthony I. Shin, Esq.

PRINCIPAL ATTORNEY

Practice Areas
Meet Our Team
Shin Law Office, PLC
Leesburg, VA

 

Related Guides

References